There are few things I like more than discovering and
recommending folk and fairy tales that break the rules. Or, at least, break what people think are the
rules. You see, many people have this
set of expectations for how fairy tales are supposed to go based on what they
see in the media. Such fairy tale
“rules” are as follows: 1) All princesses and princes are good, 2) Princesses get
rescued by princes, 3) Step-families are always trouble and 4) True love’s kiss
dispels all sorts of enchantments, among others. You know the sort of thing. Would it surprise you that folklorists and
fairy tale fans have all sorts of different guidelines and earmarks by which to
recognize a fairy tale? Well, I’ll get
to those another time. First I want to
showcase a tale that breaks three of those supposed rules.
The story is entitled “Kate
Crackernuts”. The earliest version
of this story was collected on one of the Orkney Islands off the coast of Scotland . It then made it’s way into one of Andrew
Lang’s colored Fairy Books and was later included in Joseph Jacobs’s English Fairy Tales (Jacobs wasn’t
overly picky about how “English” his English fairy tales were).
The story starts with a blended royal family. There’s a queen with a daughter named Kate
and a king with a daughter named Anne.
Now, as these things usually go, the queen starts to worry that Anne is
prettier than her own daughter Kate. So,
she enlists the help of a henwife who knows magic. The henwife tells the queen to send Anne to
her, but she must be fasting for her magic to work (who knew magic had the same
requirements as getting blood drawn?).
So, the queen sends Anne out to the henwife under the pretense of
getting some eggs. The first time, it
doesn’t work because she takes a crust of bread with her and eats it as she
goes. The second time, it also doesn’t work because she comes on some commoners
picking peas and takes a handful and eats them along the way. The third time, the queen goes with her to
make sure she doesn’t eat anything. When
she gets there, she lifts the lid off the henwife’s pot and walks away with a
sheep’s head instead of her own.
Actually, there’s some rather interesting phrasing of it in Jacobs’s
book. He wrote: “off falls her own
pretty head, and on jumps a sheep’s head”.
Now tell me that visual won’t stick with you for the rest of the day!
Now, here comes the interesting part. If Kate were the stepsister of someone like
Cinderella, she would have been overjoyed that her pretty stepsister now had a
sheep’s head. She’d probably even come
up with a nickname for her like Ewe-Face or Woolhead. Instead, Kate took a fine linen cloth and
wrapped it around Anne’s head to hide her features and decided it was time for
the both of them to get the hell out of
there. And that, my friends, is how
the “wicked stepsister rule” gets broken.
The two travel on until they find their way to a
castle. It turns out that it’s a king’s
castle. What’s more, it turns out that
one of the king’s sons is sick and no one can figure out what’s wrong with
him. Also, anyone who sits up with the
sick prince disappears. Now, Kate’s a
brave girl and after she and her “sick sister” get settled in as the king’s
guests, volunteers to stay up with the sick prince. Now, Kate’s sitting up and all is well until
the stroke of midnight. At that point,
the prince rose, dressed himself and left.
He went to the stable where he saddled his horse, called to his hound
and rode off. Naturally, Kate followed
him. She even jumped up on the horse
behind him. Now, as they rode, Kate started
to pluck nuts from the trees around them (which leads to the title of the
story). They rode until they got to a
green hill, where the prince said “Open, open, green hill, and let the young
prince in with his horse and his hound”.
Kate would add in “and his lady him behind”. Then, the green hill opened up and they
passed inside.
And that’s where I’ll leave you.
Yes, I know I usually stop my plot synopses at a later
point for Folk Tale Secret Stash, but this just feels like the perfect stopping
point. You can read the rest of the
story HERE. I will tell you that the
rest of it includes some eavesdropping on fairies, more good step-sistering and
a princess working to un-enchant a prince.
That last bit actually serves to break both fake rule #2 and fake rule #4 of the
ones I listed above.
I would like to talk for a minute or two about why this
particular tale that breaks so many of Hollywood ’s
rules may not have been noticed by Hollywood . Granted, it’s not the only one, but it serves
as a good test case. This is especially
notable as we see Hollywood
and certain animation companies (:cough: Disney :cough: ) seemingly work
overtime to break the rules they created.
Heck, between Frozen and Big Hero Six, Disney seems particularly
interested in sibling relationships. So,
why not a story about a positive step-sister relationship? Well, Hollywood ’s
requirements often go beyond a simple list of “fairy tale rules” like the ones
I listed above. For one thing, there’s
the issue of structure. Hollywood movies usually use a three act structure. Despite how European fairy tales often use
cycles of three, they don’t necessarily use that structure over the course of
the whole story. In fact, this story
like many others could almost be two stories from a TV or movie
perspective. The bit with Anne and the
sheep’s head would be one and the part after Kate and Anne get to the king’s
palace could be another. Also, most Hollywood versions of fairy tales are generally thought
to need a clear antagonist. Fairy tales
often don’t need a clear antagonist as much as they need a bad situation that
must be overcome. In this story, the closest
thing to an antagonist would be Kate’s mother who got Anne sheep-headed. Expanding her part into the second half of
the story would be difficult. I imagine adapting this story would take a fair bit of rewriting (like they did to get Frozen out of "The Snow Queen"). Folk tales
like this one often came from a tradition of storytelling that had a whole
different set of rules that existed before the rules of mass market
storytelling were even written. They
broke the rules before there were even rules to break.
Still, it’s a pretty great story to read or tell aloud.
Any thoughts or ideas regarding “Kate Crackernuts” or Hollywood “fairy tale
rules”, post in the comments below.
Kate Crackernuts is such a hidden gem, and such a shame that it's so hidden. We must wonder yet again why Hollywood will rework the same fairy tales over and over again to make them more "feminist" when there are so many already feminist tales...as we were just discussing over in the comments on Tales of Faerie, I think it has mostly to do with audience familiarity and the fact that Hollywood writers and producers probably simply don't know these tales
ReplyDeleteJust wanted to add that there is a movie version of Kate Crackernuts. It's called "Anicka s lískovymi orísky", was produced in the ČSSR/Czech Republic (Some sources list the country as Czechia and some as Chechoslowakia, so I assume the film started production before the dismembration of the ČSSR, but was released aftwerwards) and came out 1993. The names of the characters were changed, but except for that it's a fairly (but not completely) faithful adaption. All the info I can find is either in Czech or German. I'm afraid the movie was never released in the anglosphere.
ReplyDeleteIt's on YouTube in full, if you don't mind the lack of sub titles.
ReplyDelete