Near as I can tell from some rudimentary research, while
they are a form of folklore, most nursery rhymes have only existed since about
the 18th century at the earliest.
Also, while many rhymes are easy to remember and pass along by word of
mouth, books of nursery rhymes have existed since the publication of Tommy Thumb’s Song Book in 1744. There seem to be a few different types of
nursery rhymes. There are lullabies, riddles,
learning rhymes and then just rhymes that don’t fit into any of the previous
categories. Interestingly, it seems that
those last ones are the ones that most intrigue scholars just because of how
people want to know where they came from and what they were used for.
Though it’s possible these rhymes were just developed for
entertainment purposes, scholars have theorized for years that certain popular
nursery rhymes were actually veiled references to historical events and
people. A lot of this can be traced back
to a book from 1930 by Katherine Elwes titled The Real Personages of Mother Goose. The argument is that the rhymes existed as
ways to ridicule, criticize or protest the British crown or other public
officials in secret so as not to get accused of treason. The thing is that a lot of this seems
speculative at best. Every source I look
at doesn’t provide any proof or point to any supporting sources. Also, theories seem to contradict each
other. One theory claims that “Mary,
Mary Quite Contrary” is about Queen Mary I of England and her tendency to torture
and execute her enemies. Meanwhile,
another source claims it was about Mary, Queen of Scots and her more frivolous
tendencies. One source claims that
“Humpty Dumpty” started out as a riddle with the answer being “an egg” while
another claims that the original “Humpty Dumpty” was a cannon that fell from
the wall of an English fort during the English Civil War and couldn’t be
retrieved. I’m kind of afraid to ask
what “Hey Diddle Diddle” might be about.
Interestingly, the Walt Disney company once made a cartoon based around
these theories.
This gets at the question of where they come from, but it
doesn’t answer the other questions.
However, I suppose we can attempt to answer them with a little bit of
common sense. The reason that these
rhymes probably stick with us is because they’re such a big part of our
childhoods. Lots of developmental
psychologists and doctors (as well as the occasional parenting blogger) have
talked about how nursery rhymes help small children develop language and
spatial skills. Also, the rhyme schemes
and rhythm of the rhymes makes them easy to remember. As for why every fairy tale mash-up uses them, a large
part of it stems from the fact that “fairy tale” is usually translated to
“Really old public domain stuff we remember from childhood” as I referenced at
the beginning of this post. However,
there is something else that has come to mind that makes nursery rhyme
characters really handy to use for these kinds of projects.
Nursery rhyme characters have names.
No, really. Fairy
tales from the folk tradition usually have characters that don’t have
names. They’re defined by things like
profession, age and gender. When they do
have names they’re usually just very common names (like Jack or Hans) or
they’re names that are boiled down descriptions (like Snow White or Bluebeard). This is because fairy tales are almost pure
plot with basic character types to carry out the roles. Nursery rhymes, on the other hand, hinge on
rhythm and rhyme scheme. So, they
usually have names that fit those rhyme schemes. Often times they’re descriptive as well, but
they are also memorable. They’re names
like Humpty Dumpty, Little Bo Peep, Jack Horner, Jack Spratt and Solomon Grundy
(the latter is not to be confused with the DC Comics super-villain that was
named after him). Using them is probably
a lot easier than using a character that’s just identified as “the youth” or
“the woodcutter” for an entire story. On
top of this, many of these characters also have notable images that have stuck
with us from picture books of years past.
These are images that are generally not trademarked by anyone
anymore. Humpty Dumpty tends to look
like a gigantic egg. Little Bo Peep is
dressed like a traditional shepherdess.
Little Boy Blue is dressed all in blue and carrying a horn. You get the picture. Basically, most “fractured fairy tales” or
“fairy tale mash-ups” hinge on the audience’s previous familiarity with the
characters and source material. In some
ways, nursery rhymes have that familiarity in ways that fairy tales often
don’t.
I’m just skimming the surface here. For a collection of these rhymes, a good
place to start would be right HERE. I
know there’s more that probably could be said about a form of folklore that has
such staying power. Maybe I’ll revisit
this topic again in the future. We’ll
see.
Haha-this quote made me laugh out loud- "a large part of it stems from the fact that “fairy tale” is usually translated to “Really old public domain stuff we remember from childhood”. So true though! I haven't thought too much about what makes nursery rhymes different from fairy tales so this is really interesting!
ReplyDeleteI joke, but as you can tell, I embrace the "really old public domain stuff we remember from childhood" approach in my own way. That's what allows me to write about stuff like The Jungle Book or legendary characters or whatever. I just usually admit that it isn't a real fairy tale up front though.
Delete