I was going to write a post about fairy tales and folklore
in connection to Harry Potter because of that Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them movie. That movie came out weeks ago, though. So, the bloom is kind of off the rose.
I know, let’s take a look at the original book of fantastic
beasts: the medieval bestiary. That’s
kind of connected. I know that it’s not
quite fairy tale related, but bestiaries hail from times when people still
seemed to believe in dragons, unicorns and mermaids. So, it’s kind of close.
A leopard. |
For those that don’t know, bestiaries were books that
described animals as the world at the time knew them but also attributed to
them philosophical teachings. This is
largely stemming from the way the three Abrahamic religions (Judaism,
Christianity and Islam) believed that the natural world was laid out by God as
a way to teach human beings how to act.
Now, it would be difficult to seek out reprintings of all these various
sources by different authors ranging from such various authors as Isidore of
Seville, Pliny the Elder and even Aesop (who is pre-medeival) among others. Luckily, the website bestiary.ca has done
most of the work for us.
Now, as I’ve said before, these are old books. They’re from a time when scientific
observation wasn’t so precise and sometimes wasn’t even a priority (heck, some
of them are from a time when alchemy was still considered a legitimate
science). So, these books aren’t really
as interesting for what they got right as what they got wrong.
Let’s look at some choice selections:
Let’s see. Pliny the
Elder had this to say about bears: “Newborn cubs are a shapeless lump of white
flesh with no eyes or hair, though the claws are visible. The mother bear gradually licks her cubs into
proper shape, and keeps them warm by hugging them to her breast and lying on
them, just as birds do with their eggs.”
And about the Boa, Isidore of Seville says “The boa is an
emense snake from Italy. It pursues
heards of cattle and oxen, and attaching to their udders kills them by sucking
the milk; it is thus called boas from the killing of oxen (boa).”
Apes (meaning all non-human primates in this sense),
according to Aesop always give birth to twins.
One the mother loves and holds in her arms, the other she hates and must
cling to her back. Though, according to
Aesop, the mother has a tendency of smothering the baby it carries in its arms
while the hated child survives.
There is a whole lot said about lions. According to Herodotus, the lioness can only
give birth once because the claws of the lion cub are so sharp even in utero
that it damages the womb even before it’s born.
Pliny the Elder refutes this but also says that lion cubs are born as
lumps of flesh the size of weasels (much like he said about bears). He also says that their breath is a severe
poison. A number of the scholars claimed
the lion used its tail as a sort of brush to erase its tracks.
There's a lot more. If you're interested, click over to bestiary.ca.
A bear, licking her cub into shape. |
Even the entries about mythical beasts seem a little off. Pliny the Elder again said “India produces
the largest elephants as well as the largest dragons, which are perpetually at
war with the elephants.” Did I miss a
whole bunch of legends about elephants fighting dragons because that sounds
awesome!
The interesting thing about all this is how a lack of
knowledge combined with hearsay and creative license resulted in descriptions
of real animals that made them sound like mythical beasts. Snakes that drink milk! Apes that hate their children! Hedgehogs carrying away grapes on their
quills! Bears that have cubs made of
play-doh!
Now you may think this sounds strange and preposterous. Imagine treating real, live animals as if
they were mythical creatures. But, um .
. . have you seen the way our modern culture treats dinosaurs?
No one living has ever seen a dinosaur. Yet, ever since humanity discovered that they
had once existed we’ve been fascinated with them and we’ve built stories around
them.
We’ve created worlds where they still live. We’ve made them into monsters that chase humans. We’ve had heroes ride on them as mounts. We’ve made them soft and kid-friendly (I may have to apologize for linking to that song). We’ve even turned them into aliens before. But we’ve always
taken liberties with them because we’ve always known less than we’ve
imagined. The dinosaur has become the
dragon of the post-industrial age. That’s
probably why science encountered such a push back when they asked the world to
consider dinosaurs in a new way.
In the not too distant past, scientists suggested the
possibility that dinosaurs were a step in between the evolution of reptiles and
the evolution of birds. This meant that
in all possibility, dinosaurs could have been covered in feathers. New discoveries have shown that these
scientists have been on the ball. But
our modern culture still has trouble imagining feathered dinosaurs. The idea that our modern mythical beasts
resemble dragons less than they resemble Foghorn Leghorn still throws
people. Granted, it doesn’t help that
our culture doesn’t respect birds much except as poultry dinners and creatures
gifted with the power of flight (dinosaurs are neither edible nor could
fly. Thus, they have an uphill battle
ahead of them).
A rather feathery dinosaur. |
Now, as I said before, this whole post may seem a bit off
topic (though, I suppose a lot of this could be seen as “lore”). But I think it could also serve as a reminder
to keep our perspective as we chase old stories. The longer ago these stories were written
down, the more we’ll have to deal with the misconceptions of those writers from
long ago. Not just social misconceptions
about race, religion and sex but even misconceptions about the natural world
around them. Heck, I just finished
reading Basile’s The Tale of Tales and
one story involved a dolphin giving someone a scale off his back (dolphins are
not fish and do not have scales) and another alluded to people who were bitten
by tarantulas being driven to dance to music until the poison was sweated out
(pretty sure that isn’t true). But the
old stories are still worth a look, even if we aren’t willing to accept
everything they tell us.
Why is the bear also a cyclops?
ReplyDeleteMedieval art wasn't always so representative of real life. In this case, I believe we're supposed to be viewing the bear's face from the side.
DeleteAnd how many of our rock solid beliefs about what we think we know now will be dispelled in the future.
ReplyDelete